BANGKOK: Most residents of Bangkok have expressed opposition to a proposed policy of collecting a 50 baht fee per vehicle for traffic congestion. The fee is intended to support the infrastructure fund for a new policy offering a flat rate of 20 baht for electric train travel across all routes, a key initiative by the Pheu Thai Party government led by Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra.
According to Thai News Agency, the policy was originally initiated under former Prime Minister Settha Thavisin’s administration, with Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Transport Suriya Juangroongruangkit announcing a clear timeline for implementation by September 2025. The Ministry of Finance is examining the feasibility of collecting a congestion charge in high-traffic areas such as Sukhumvit, Ratchadaphisek, and Silom, where approximately 700,000 vehicles circulate daily. Inspired by successful implementations in countries like the UK and Singapore, the proposed charge aims to alleviate congestion and promote affordab
le public transport.
During a field visit by the Thai News Agency to Ratchadaphisek Road, locals voiced their disagreement with the policy, citing financial burdens. Regular users of the road highlighted the potential increase in monthly expenses by 1,500 baht, arguing that alternative funding sources should be explored by the government.
Mr. Samart Rachapolsit, former Deputy Governor of Bangkok for Civil Engineering and Traffic, expressed support for the reduced electric train fare but pointed out the financial implications. He noted that implementing the 20 baht fare on various lines would require substantial compensation to the private sector, potentially draining the MRTA’s current funds within a few years. He raised concerns about the feasibility of collecting traffic fees, given Bangkok’s numerous small streets and potential for fee avoidance.
Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Finance, Mr. Laworn Sangsanit, emphasized that the proposal is merely an idea and discussions are ongoing to identify su
itable funding methods. He stated that the congestion fee is one of several options under consideration and that further deliberations are necessary to determine the most effective approach.