Bangkok: Anutin Charnvirakul, the Prime Minister and Minister of the Interior, has questioned the Pheu Thai Party’s plans to debate government policies before they have even taken over the administration. He expressed concerns that debating issues related to damages in the country, including injuries and deaths among soldiers and civilians, would hinder national progress. Anutin acknowledged the right of four generals appointed by the Pheu Thai Party to debate and dissect government policy, but noted that there would be no counter-debates on these issues.

According to Thai News Agency, Anutin, who also leads the Bhumjaithai Party, commented on the Pheu Thai Party’s preparation for debates in Parliament. He stated that it is the right and duty of Members of Parliament to question government policies, and he is prepared to address any doubts. However, he maintained that there would be no need for a counter-debate on the issues raised.

Anutin also touched on the so-called “Thunder Castle” connections within the cabinet, questioning why the Pheu Thai Party did not first look into their established connections. He indicated that his approach would differ from theirs and urged them to self-reflect.

In response to the Pheu Thai Party’s decision to remain an independent opposition and not join the Prachachon Party, Anutin remarked that this move should not lead to a vengeful political environment. He mentioned that only four months remain after the policy statement, after which he plans to dissolve Parliament. Anutin emphasized the importance of mutual respect and setting a positive example, particularly in maintaining good relations with neighboring countries.

Anutin reiterated his stance on the Pheu Thai Party’s premature debate plans, questioning what there is to discuss when the administration has not yet begun. He warned that debating his actions, particularly those causing harm to civilians and soldiers, would not lead to progress. Anutin concluded by stating that he would only remain in office for four months and that the ultimate decision should rest with the electorate, not political opponents.