Bangkok: The case involving Boss Paul’s lawyer, who has taken legal action against a singer, is moving forward with clarity, according to Pol. Col. Charoenkiat Pankaew, deputy commander of the Central Investigation Bureau. The investigation is being expedited following demands for 7.5 million baht from a well-known lawyer, with warnings issued for volunteers to thoroughly examine evidence before making it public.

According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Witoon Kaengngan, the lawyer representing Mr. Woratphon Woratworakul, also known as Boss Paul, lodged a complaint against Ms. Krisanong, the owner of the Krisanong Anti-Corruption page, and Mr. Ekkapop, founder of the Sai Mai Must Survive page. This action followed a directive from Pol. Lt. Gen. Jiraphop Phuridet, commander of the Central Investigation Bureau, to expedite case handling to ensure transparency and accountability. Mr. Witoon filed two complaints with the Technology Crime Suppression Division: one against Ms. Krisanong and another against Mr. Ekkapop.
Additionally, a complaint was filed with the Crime Suppression Division concerning lawyer Tum’s alleged demand for 7.5 million baht prior to Boss Paul’s arrest, with coordination reported from Sittra Law Firm.

When questioned about the sufficiency of evidence for issuing summonses or arrest warrants, Pol. Lt. Col. Charoenkiat indicated that the situation is becoming clearer. He stated that the first case would be resolved within the week, although the delay in filing the complaint was due to the lawyer’s other commitments. An expedited process is now underway.

Regarding potential criminal implications related to a politician’s audio clip, Pol. Lt. Col. Charoenkiat refrained from commenting due to limited evidence, noting that the Department of Special Investigation (DSI) had identified financial links to the politician. Should substantial evidence emerge, money laundering charges would be pursued by the DSI.

Pol. Lt. Gen. Charoonkiat addressed activists, emphasizing the importance of evidence verification
before proceeding with legal actions. He reassured that cooperation with investigators would protect individuals from defamation and computer crime charges. He cautioned against impulsive actions that could harm organizations and urged volunteers to use this case as a guideline for their activities.