Bangkok: ‘Chaichanok’ views whether to withdraw cannabis from being a narcotic or not as a matter for the government. Chaichanok vows to end it quickly after the People’s Party proposed postponing the casino law first, emphasizing that his position was clear from the beginning, but the party’s resolution must wait for the meeting. Meanwhile, regarding cannabis, Bhumjaithai Party insists that it is not pulling anyone’s mustache. As for whether to withdraw it as a narcotic or not, that is a matter for the government.

According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Chaichanok Chidchob, secretary-general of the Bhumjaithai Party, spoke about the case of the Bhumjaithai Party withdrawing from the coalition government and the Pheu Thai Party government bringing cannabis back to being a narcotic, saying that they are not in the executive branch, and this is the executive branch’s decision-making power. However, he assured that they will continue to do their best in things that are beneficial to the country.

When questioned if this reflects a tug of war between the Bhumjaithai and Pheu Thai parties, Mr. Chaichanok expressed that he did not perceive it as such. He emphasized that their intention is to proceed as planned, doing their utmost and aligning their actions with what they believe is beneficial. He suggested that the public should be the judge of their actions.

Regarding the cannabis policy, originally a Bhumjaithai Party initiative, Mr. Chaichanok noted that any policy changes would be contingent on the situation. He stressed the importance of adapting to current circumstances and prioritizing based on the evolving challenges faced by the country.

On the subject of the Prachachon Party’s proposal to delay the Integrated Entertainment Venues Act, Mr. Chaichanok acknowledged the need for party discussions but reiterated his stance. He mentioned that while the timing might not be ideal, resolving the issue could allow focus on other pressing matters. Ultimately, he indicated the decision rests with the government.

When pressed on whether the government should address the act in parliament, Mr. Chaichanok advocated for discussions centered on public benefit. He urged patience from the public, as further consultations had not yet occurred with the Prachachon Party, but reaffirmed the clarity of his position.

“I think that actions are more important than words and statements. We have been very clear all along on everything, not just the Entertainment Complex Act. We will continue to be like that. I want the public to follow,” concluded Mr. Chaichanok.