Bangkok: Chada Thaiset, MP for Uthai Thani and a member of the Bhumjaithai Party, has revealed that the IO movement of the Red Camp was initiated by a former likay performer aiming to tarnish Anutin’s reputation.
According to Thai News Agency, Chada also linked the ongoing Thai-Cambodian war to a conflict of interest between Thaksin Shinawatra and Hun Sen over the island of Koh Kood. He expressed his condolences for Paethongtarn, describing her as a victim poorly shielded by her father.
Chada justified Thailand’s decision to broadcast unsettling sounds on its own territory, framing it as a legitimate wartime measure. He accused the “IO” movement of the Red Shirts of seeking to damage Anutin and lauded Kan Jom Phalang for his nationalistic efforts. He criticized the Senate for lodging complaints he deemed inhumane, arguing that those lacking in patriotism should remain silent during these times.
In an interview on October 13, Chada discussed the current tensions between Thailand and Cambodia, noting that Thailand had resorted to using psychedelic sounds at Ban Nong Chan, Khok Sung District, Sa Kaeo Province. He emphasized that modern warfare takes many forms and defended the use of local music as a non-violent tactic. Chada argued that the root of the conflict lay in the personal interests of Thaksin and Hun Sen, rather than a clash between nations.
Chada also criticized the handling of negotiations with ASEAN Chairman Anwar Ibrahim, arguing that Thailand’s diplomatic efforts were undermined. He questioned the role of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs under the previous government and highlighted the financial interests tied to the island of Koh Kood. Chada insisted that the Thai public deserves to know the truth about these issues.
He further commented on the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) related to the conflict, stating that it dates back to 2001 and that the Thai public was largely unaware of its details until recently. Chada accused both the state and politicians of concealing information and sought to redirect attention to Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul amidst the conflict.
Chada addressed rumors on social media about Anutin’s alleged criticism of the Second Army commander, attributing them to political machinations. He reiterated that the IO movement originated from a temple-based operation involving members of a certain political party and former likay performers. Chada expressed confidence in his knowledge and willingness to answer questions about these claims.
On expectations for the government to address border issues, Chada explained that the situation is an international conflict requiring careful handling. He stressed that the Prime Minister and military have been given full authority to manage the situation. He cautioned against unnecessary media coverage of sensitive issues, emphasizing the need for military and security expertise in managing the conflict.
Chada concluded by addressing a senator’s comments about human rights violations, stressing that timing and context are crucial when discussing such issues. He praised Jom Phalang’s actions as beneficial to the nation and criticized those who speak out without considering the national interest. Chada argued that the current psychological warfare is not a violation of human rights and criticized those who appear to lack patriotism in their comments.