Criminal Court for Corruption Cases Hosts Seminar on Balancing Rights for Agencies Involved in Corruption Cases

Bangkok: The Criminal Court for Corruption Cases recently organized a seminar focusing on the challenges of creating a balance of rights for agencies involved in corruption and misconduct cases. The Deputy Commissioner of the Central Investigation Bureau was among the key participants, emphasizing the collaborative efforts of all agencies to benefit the public and act as a first line of defense against influential entities.

According to Thai News Agency, the seminar was part of a project to enhance coordination among justice agencies involved in the justice education process for the fiscal year 2015. The event featured significant contributions from Mr. Apichart Lueangruang, Deputy Chief Justice of the Central Criminal Court for Corruption and Misconduct Cases, and several other key figures including Mr. Kowit Sripairoj, Attorney General, and Mr. Amnat Puangchomphu, Chairman of the Anti-Corruption Commission.

The discussion highlighted the operational processes of the Central Criminal Court for Corruption and Misconduct Cases. Mr. Apichart explained the court’s mission to maintain public order and protect government officials and citizens. The court employs an investigative system, allowing it to independently gather facts and question witnesses. Swift and clearly defined procedures characterize the criminal proceedings, with an emphasis on essential evidence only.

The seminar underscored the court’s authority to handle corruption cases, including those involving government officials accused of corruption or misconduct. The escape of accused individuals does not affect the statute of limitations, with absconding punishable by imprisonment and fines. The court also reserves the right to proceed in the absence of the defendant.

Pol. Col. Charoonkiat discussed the efforts to unify anti-corruption agencies to ensure justice for the public. He emphasized the importance of collaboration among various bodies like the National Anti-Corruption Commission and the Anti-Money Laundering Office. The seminar stressed the need for fairness and accuracy in prosecuting corruption cases, with a focus on reducing corruption and improving the situation.

The discussion touched on the sensitive issue of monks involved in legal proceedings, clarifying that the aim is not to undermine religious institutions but to protect those who practice correctly. The court remains impartial in issuing arrest warrants, ensuring justice for all, regardless of their position or role.

In conclusion, the seminar reaffirmed the court’s commitment to providing justice and supporting government officials in their duties. The collaborative approach among justice agencies aims to foster peace and fairness for all citizens.