Bangkok: “Saeng” has expressed confidence that no external pressure will influence the Election Commission (EC) as it faces a 30-day deadline to conclude its investigation into alleged collusion in the selection of senators.
According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Saeng Boonmee, the Secretary-General of the Election Commission, stated that the EC is committed to conducting a transparent and fair investigation into the Senate collusion case. The investigation, which has been ongoing since the announcement of the results on July 10, 2014, involves collaboration with the Department of Special Investigation (DSI), the Anti-Money Laundering Office, and the police. Initially, each case was prosecuted separately, but the format was later adjusted to work with the DSI’s special committee to oversee the process holistically. Despite being expedited, the investigation must ensure fairness for all parties involved, considering the complexity of the selection process from local to national levels.
Mr. Sa-wang addressed concerns about the investigation’s timeline, explaining that while the EC regulations suggest a one-year timeframe, it is not legally mandated. With approximately 30 days remaining, he assured that extensions could be granted if necessary to collect comprehensive and accurate information. The EC aims to expedite its work, but the investigation committee can extend the deadline if justified by specific reasons.
Regarding allegations of collusion involving the EC Secretary-General, Mr. Sa-wang emphasized that the investigations are conducted within the EC’s authority. He acknowledged the existence of complaints but stressed the importance of addressing them directly with the relevant agency rather than through the media to avoid retaliatory debates. Mr. Saeng reiterated his willingness to be investigated and to provide necessary clarifications.
Mr. Saeng also commented on the resignation of a reserve senator purportedly due to vested interests, indicating that the petitioner must prove the EC Secretary-General’s involvement. Despite decisions by two or three agencies, further complaints and accusations continue to emerge. Mr. Saeng is prepared to be investigated and provide explanations to address all concerns.
Dismissing rumors of external influence, Mr. Saeng assured that no invisible hand, including General S., is pressuring the EC or independent organizations. He also addressed the case where 92 senators requested fairness from the EC concerning the work of the 26th investigation committee. He clarified that the committee, established by the EC’s order, has not been subject to any changes by the EC.
When questioned about providing clarifications related to the collusion allegations, Mr. Sa-wang noted that no agency, including the 26th Investigation Committee, has summoned him yet. He expressed a desire to clarify matters to the authorities but preferred not to engage in media discussions to avoid public debates. He also addressed claims by a former Samut Prakan election inspector, stating that the EC had already reached a final decision on the matter.
Mr. Saeng mentioned reports suggesting that the 26th investigation committee would conclude the case and submit it to the EC meeting on June 16. He emphasized that the investigation process must adhere to regulations to ensure fairness for all involved. The case must be considered at the office level, with complaints and objections adjudicated before reaching the EC meeting.
When asked about the EC’s policy on handling the case, Mr. Sa-wang stated that the office is following the investigation procedure’s steps, which are independent and involve multiple layers. The EC will be informed of the investigation committee’s progress only when a request for an extension is made by the 26th investigation committee.