Election Commission of Thailand Clarifies Allegations of Employee Misconduct in Senator Election Case

Bangkok: The Election Commission of Thailand (ECT) has addressed recent allegations concerning a former employee accused of receiving money transfers in connection with a collusion case involving the election of senators. The ECT clarified that these allegations, which predate the formation of the 26th Investigative Committee, are unrelated to the committee’s activities. The commission has proactively dismissed the employee in question and formed an investigative committee to ensure a transparent examination of the matter.

According to Thai News Agency, the Election Commission (EC) released a statement to address circulating information on social media about the submission of documents to the Department of Special Investigation (DSI) to consider the case as a special investigation. The allegations involve an EC employee reportedly receiving money transfers between April and June 2024, linked to the solicitation of benefits related to the senator collusion case.

The Election Commission of Thailand (ECT) clarified that the money transfer incident occurred in 2024, while the 26th Central Investigation and Inquiry Committee, tasked with selecting senators, began its duties in March 2025, indicating no involvement in the reported incident. Upon learning of the alleged misconduct, the EC acted promptly, ordering the employee’s dismissal pending investigation. A complaint was filed with the appropriate investigator, and a disciplinary committee was appointed to ensure a thorough investigation.

The ECT underscores its commitment to transparency, honesty, and integrity in all its operations and is prepared to collaborate with relevant agencies to conduct a comprehensive investigation. The commission’s swift response was reportedly prompted by Mr. Phatthapong Suphakson, also known as Lawyer Aun Buriram, who revealed a financial trail map purported to be direct evidence of a senator election collusion ring in Amnat Charoen Province. The evidence implicates an EC official, identified as S., accused of receiving money transfers from individuals involved in the collusion ring.