Bangkok: Natthaphong Ruangpanyawut, Leader of the Opposition, has raised concerns regarding the government’s approach towards the proposed referendum to revoke MOUs 43-44. During a session at the House of Representatives, chaired by Second Deputy Speaker Mr. Chalat Khamchuang, Natthaphong directed pointed questions towards Mr. Sihasak Phuangketkaew, the Minister of Foreign Affairs. He sought clarity on how the government plans to conduct the referendum without violating laws that ensure unbiased electoral processes.

According to Thai News Agency, Natthaphong cited a Nida Poll indicating that 69 percent of the populace remains unclear on the implications of the MOUs, with a majority supporting the idea of the referendum coinciding with the next election. He pressed the government on its plans to ensure that the revocation process adheres to the referendum law, which prohibits bias, and questioned the readiness of the government to mitigate potential damages should the MOUs be revoked. Concerns were also raised about the implications of the MOUs on the Thai-Cambodian border demarcation, and how the government plans to manage potential conflicts, especially regarding natural resource concessions in overlapping maritime territories.

Minister Sihasak responded by emphasizing the importance of the MOUs in relation to territorial sovereignty and the public’s role in the decision-making process. He stated that the referendum’s implementation must be thoroughly considered and that the government is committed to addressing compensation issues for private entities potentially affected by the revocation. Sihasak also announced that Deputy Prime Minister Bowornsak Uwanno is expected to conduct a meeting to discuss these matters further, with plans to present a comprehensive explanation to Parliament once a clear strategy is formulated.

Natthaphong, in a follow-up round of questioning, sought further clarification from the Foreign Minister on whether the government stands by the revocation of MOUs 43-44. He expressed concerns over the use of nationalistic sentiment for political leverage and questioned the government’s diplomatic strategies. Sihasak reiterated that the MOUs are central to Thailand’s national interests and that any referendum must be clearly defined to protect these interests. He acknowledged the need for a contingency plan in the absence of the MOUs and assured that those affected would be compensated.

The discussion highlighted the complexities surrounding the MOUs and the need for a well-considered approach to prevent international disputes, such as those involving Cambodia. Natthaphong urged the Foreign Minister to clearly articulate his stance and ensure that political agendas do not overshadow national interests. Sihasak concluded by affirming the importance of depoliticizing foreign affairs and prioritizing national interest in the government’s deliberations.