Bangkok: “Prits” has called on the public to vigilantly observe the government’s decision to withdraw a controversial entertainment bill, questioning whether the move is genuine or a strategic delay until the administration secures enough votes to reintroduce it. The public sector has submitted a formal request to opposition parties, urging them to apply parliamentary pressure to ensure the bill’s removal.
According to Thai News Agency, the opposition, led by Mr. Parit Wacharasindhu, a spokesman for the Prachachon Party, has received a letter from civil society representatives. Mr. Thanakorn Khomkrit, Secretary-General of the Stop Gambling Foundation, spearheaded this appeal on behalf of a broad civil society network, advocating for the use of parliamentary mechanisms to pressure the government into withdrawing the draft legislation regarding the operation of entertainment complexes.
Mr. Thanakorn highlighted that the coalition parties have resolved to employ all parliamentary means to pressure the government to retract the draft bill, with assurances that it will not be resubmitted. Civil society networks, including those representing children, families, healthcare professionals, religious groups, educators, and media, support this resolution. They argue that the supposed economic benefits of legalized gambling are outweighed by social harms, that the bill could exacerbate gambling issues, and that the concept of ‘responsible gambling’ shifts accountability to individuals rather than businesses. They also emphasize the need for systematic solutions to gambling-related problems, including education and transparent legal reforms.
Mr. Thanakorn further emphasized the importance of preventative measures, such as educating the public on the risks of gambling and promoting values of hard work. Additionally, he advocated for progressive fiscal policies to support public health initiatives funded by gambling taxes, and for broad societal involvement in safeguarding against gambling’s harms. Comprehensive reform of gambling laws, aimed at genuine problem-solving without hidden agendas, is essential, he argued.
Mr. Pris reassured the public that the opposition parties are committed to opposing this bill, which they believe lacks clear economic justification and measures against gambling and money laundering. He noted that while the government whip has indicated a willingness to withdraw the bill, it remains crucial to scrutinize whether this withdrawal is motivated by genuine concern or by political strategy.
Mr. Parit underscored the importance of public vigilance in evaluating the sincerity of the government’s actions, suggesting that if the withdrawal is merely a tactic to gather more votes for future reintroduction, it would be insincere. He urged citizens to critically assess the government’s reasons for the bill’s withdrawal.