Rome: Rangsiman Rome, MP for the party list and deputy leader of the Prachachon Party, has voiced concerns regarding Somsak Thepsuthin’s decision to veto a resolution passed by the Medical Council concerning former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra.

According to Thai News Agency, Somsak, who serves as Minister of Public Health and special prime minister, reportedly intervened following a Medical Council resolution on Thaksin’s health status.

Mr. Rangsiman emphasized the importance of adhering to medical facts, noting that the Medical Council had declared Thaksin not critically ill. This declaration should have concluded the necessity for Thaksin’s continued treatment at the Police General Hospital. Instead, Rangsiman suggests the intervention has allowed Thaksin to avoid imprisonment and live comfortably, implying an undue privilege.

The controversy centers on whether the Medical Council will uphold its decision despite Somsak’s veto. Rangsiman hopes the Council will act with integrity, stressing the need for transparency and accountability. He warns that if the situation persists, it could set a concerning precedent where influential individuals receive preferential treatment, undermining Thailand’s justice system.

Additionally, Rangsiman alludes to the political connections influencing the case, mentioning Thaksin’s power and influence over Somsak, who is related to the Prime Minister. This, he argues, exacerbates the situation, portraying it as a matter of aiding friends rather than upholding justice.

Rangsiman also expressed dissatisfaction with the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) for what he perceives as a sluggish response. He believes that statements from key individuals like Ms. Paethongtarn and Mr. Thaksin should have been expedited to foster confidence in the process.

With a resolution vote pending, requiring 48 votes to overturn the veto, Rangsiman remains uncertain about the outcome. However, he stresses the importance of maintaining public trust in Thailand’s medical and political institutions. He recalls Thaksin’s seemingly good health upon returning to Thailand, contrasting it with claims of critical illness shortly after incarceration, which he finds implausible.

In conclusion, Rangsiman calls for a collective acknowledgment of the issues plaguing Thailand’s justice system, including corruption and ineffective law enforcement. He urges medical professionals to remain impartial and uphold public trust, amidst growing skepticism. As the situation develops, Rangsiman suggests potential scrutiny by the House of Representatives Committee on State Security, which he chairs, to ensure a fair and transparent resolution.