Bangkok: The Senate Entertainment Committee has raised alarms over irregularities in a proposed bill to legalize casinos, arguing that gambling does not contribute to economic growth and poses significant risks, including potential criminal activity and constitutional violations.
According to Thai News Agency, the committee presented its findings during a Senate meeting chaired by Mr. Mongkol Surassajja, the first president of the Senate. Dr. Weerapan Suwannammai, chairman of the committee, reported that their investigations into the proposed entertainment complex revealed three critical areas of concern: economic, social, and legal aspects. The committee’s findings suggest that gambling fails to drive the economy and could lead to a downturn in the casino industry, with online gambling expected to rise as a replacement. Dr. Weerapan emphasized that Thailand can attract high-quality investors and tourists without relying on casinos, citing the country’s potential in industries like holistic health promotion.
Dr. Weerapan also highlighted the social implications, noting that gambling addiction has severe impacts and casinos could become breeding grounds for sophisticated crimes. He recommended public hearings to gauge public opinion on the matter. Legally, the draft bill appears to contradict the Thai Constitution, particularly Sections 5, 58, and 63, which emphasize the rule of law, ethical governance, and anti-corruption measures.
Mr. Charan Pakdeethanakul, a former Constitutional Court judge and committee member, expressed concerns about how the bill aligns with constitutional principles. He emphasized that any legal provisions allowing casinos must not conflict with the Constitution, which prioritizes the rule of law and ethical governance. Mr. Charan warned that legalizing casinos could exacerbate corruption and undermine the country’s commitment to good governance and sustainable development, as outlined in the national strategy.
While Dr. Weerapan acknowledged that the committee’s study is ongoing, he underscored the importance of thorough research to inform future legislative efforts. He noted that even if the government withdraws the current draft, the committee’s work will serve as a valuable resource for future considerations, ensuring that any similar proposals align with constitutional and ethical standards.