Bangkok: Sirikanya Tansakul, a party-list MP for the Prachachon Party, has voiced her concerns regarding the policies of the Anutin government, highlighting that their strategies are reminiscent of past administrations. She criticized the lack of specific goals and clear plans in the economic policy, questioning whether the “Half-Half” budget allocation serves a political agenda.
According to Thai News Agency, Ms. Sirikanya emphasized that a robust government policy statement should clearly outline the administration’s aims, the path to achieving them, and the timeline for doing so. Instead, she observed that the current policy statement mirrors those of previous governments, including that of General Prayut Chan-o-cha, with broad and vague definitions that lack actionable indicators.
Ms. Sirikanya expressed skepticism about the government’s ability to address specific problems within its limited tenure of four months. She underscored the necessity for the government to manage immediate issues effectively without making irreversible decisions that could have long-term negative impacts. She also stressed the importance of not misusing taxpayer money for political advantage.
Highlighting the urgency of the government’s agenda, Ms. Sirikanya pointed out that every policy is deemed urgent due to the short timeframe. She bemoaned the lack of clarity and prioritization in the policy statement, noting that it outlines “what” should be done but fails to explain “how” these objectives will be achieved within the four-month period.
Ms. Sirikanya questioned the Bhumjaithai Party’s preparedness and political agenda, expressing doubts about their policies and their ability to deliver a “Big Quick Win” as stated by the Prime Minister. She cited the example of the individual debt resolution policy, which lacks clear implementation details, and questioned the feasibility of increasing SMEs’ liquidity without detailed plans.
Addressing the “Half-Half Plus” project, Ms. Sirikanya noted the unexpected involvement of the Deputy Leader of the Bhumjaithai Party in providing information. She questioned whether this was a political or economic initiative, as the project requires a substantial budget and the government seems rushed to secure funding. Ms. Sirikanya argued that the scheme may not effectively stimulate the economy and could be perceived as a political tool to garner votes.
Ms. Sirikanya highlighted the urgency for the government to make crucial financial decisions by the end of the year, including setting the 2027 budget framework, addressing the public debt, and possibly raising the public debt ceiling. She warned against reckless spending aimed at boosting popularity, stressing the importance of maintaining the country’s fiscal stability.
Ms. Sirikanya concluded by urging the government to avoid actions that could cause irreversible economic damage, emphasizing the need to maintain public confidence in the future.