Bangkok: Nattawut Saikua has reiterated his opposition to a coup following the incitement of protests by leaders who have previously been involved in two coup d’©tats. He emphasized that, over the past 20 years, significant political parties have been involved in such movements.

According to Thai News Agency, Mr. Saikua posted on Facebook regarding a recent rally, noting an increase in participation since the Sathit government. He attributed this to the mobilization of networks and allies across various regions, including social power groups. He acknowledged that the persistent movement of large crowds over months and years necessitates the involvement of major political parties. Saikua anticipates that the political landscape will soon become clearer, warning that any deviation would be unprecedented in Thai politics.

The primary force behind these protests consists of conservative groups previously mobilized under the PAD and PDRC. The demographic is largely middle-aged to elderly. The aim is to topple the government, pressure Prime Minister Paethongtarn to resign, and urge coalition parties to withdraw. Saikua cautioned that even if the Prime Minister resigns, protests may persist, as the core leaders are unlikely to accept any alternative candidates proposed by the Pheu Thai Party.

Saikua highlighted that the protest leaders have not ruled out supporting a military coup, with some advocating for drafting a new constitution independently of politicians. He questioned whether the group is interested in seizing power once again, noting that a coup would diverge from democratic principles.

Reflecting on history, Saikua argued that dissolving parliament is not a viable solution. He cited past instances where the dissolution of parliament did not resolve political unrest, ultimately leading to military coups. Saikua emphasized respect for freedom and rights, while acknowledging dissatisfaction with the current government. He urged all parties to accept the Prime Minister’s decisions within the framework of the law.

Saikua expressed concerns that political instability could leave Thailand vulnerable to external threats. He argued against the notion that waiting too long could result in a coup, advocating for maintaining democratic processes and political stability. Saikua called on both opposition and government parties to reject extra-systemic power and prevent any movements that could pave the way for a coup.